Around 5:00 p.m. in the afternoon on Christmas Day in 2020, as many Americans were celebrating with family, President Donald Trump was at his Mar-a-Lago home in Palm Beach, Florida, on the phone with a little-known conservative lawyer who was encouraging his attempts to overturn the election, according to a memo the lawyer later wrote documenting the call.
The lawyer, William Olson, was promoting several extreme ideas to the president. Olson later conceded some of them could be regarded as tantamount to declaring “martial law” and could even invite comparisons with Watergate. The plan included tampering with the Justice Department and firing the acting attorney general, according to the Dec. 28 memo by Olson, titled “Preserving Constitutional Order,” describing their discussions.
“Our little band of lawyers is working on a memorandum that explains exactly what you can do,” Olson wrote in his memo, obtained by The New York Times, which he marked “privileged and confidential” and sent to the president. “The media will call this martial law,” he wrote, adding that “that is ‘fake news.’”
The document highlights the previously unreported role of Olson in advising Trump as the president was increasingly turning to extreme, far-right figures outside the White House to pursue options that many of his official advisers had told him were impossible or unlawful, in an effort to cling to power.
The involvement of a person like Olson, who now represents conspiracy theorist and MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, underscores how the system that would normally insulate a president from rogue actors operating outside of official channels had broken down within weeks after the 2020 election.
That left Trump in direct contact with people who promoted conspiracy theories or questionable legal ideas, telling him not only what he wanted to hear but also that they – not the public servants advising him – were the only ones he could trust.
“In our long conversation earlier this week, I could hear the shameful and dismissive attitude of the lawyer from White House Counsel’s Office toward you personally – but more importantly toward the Office of the President of the United States itself,” Olson wrote to Trump. “This is unacceptable.”
It was not immediately clear how Olson, who practices law in Washington, D.C., and Virginia, arrived in Trump’s orbit. Olson previously worked with Republican super political action committees and promoted a conspiracy theory that Vice President Kamala Harris is not eligible to be vice president, falsely claiming she is not a natural-born U.S. citizen. He and his firm have long represented Gun Owners of America, an advocacy group.
According to his website, which displays a photograph of him shaking hands with President Richard Nixon, Olson was a White House intern in 1971.
His 2020 memo was written 10 days after one of the most dramatic meetings ever held in the Trump White House, during which three of the president’s White House advisers vied – at one point almost physically – with outside actors to influence Trump. In that meeting, lawyer Sidney Powell and Michael Flynn, the former national security adviser, pushed for Trump to seize voting machines and appoint Powell special counsel to investigate wild and groundless claims of voter fraud, even as White House lawyers fought back.
But the document suggests that even after his aides had won that skirmish in the Oval Office, Trump continued to seek extreme legal advice that ran counter to the recommendations of the Justice Department and the counsel’s office.
And the memo indicates that Trump was acting on the outside advice. At one point, it refers to the president urging Olson to contact the acting attorney general directly about having the Justice Department lend its credibility to Trump’s legal efforts to invalidate the election results.
A person familiar with the work of the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol said the committee was aware that Olson was in contact with Trump and that it was exploring Olson’s role in pushing forward plans to overturn the 2020 election.
Olson did not respond to requests for comment.
A spokesperson for Trump did not respond to a request for comment about the former president’s relationship with Olson.
According to his memo, Olson was discussing with Trump the notion that the Justice Department would intercede directly with the Supreme Court to reverse his electoral defeat.
The court had declined to hear a case that allies of Trump in Texas had brought challenging the election results in Pennsylvania, saying the plaintiffs lacked standing.
Olson told Trump that he believed the Justice Department “will do nothing except continue to run out the clock.”
“While time to act was short when we spoke on Christmas Day, time is about to run out,” he wrote.
It was unclear which White House lawyer Olson referred to in his memo. At the time, the White House counsel, Pat Cipollone; Patrick Philbin, his deputy; and another lawyer who did not work for the counsel’s office, Eric Herschmann, were working in tandem to push back on some of the more outlandish ideas being recommended. Cipollone and Herschmann had taken lead roles during the Dec. 18 White House meeting in countering Powell and Flynn.
“The feeling I had was that not just was he not offering you any options, but that he was there to make certain you did not consider any,” Olson wrote, referring to the unnamed White House lawyer. “But you do have options.”
Among those whom Olson mentioned as speaking to Trump about the Justice Department getting involved was Mark Martin, the former chief justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court. White House officials believed at the time that Martin was brought in through Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff.
Olson urged Trump to hire another lawyer, Kurt Olsen, who had worked on the Texas case.
“As I emailed Molly Saturday morning,” Olson wrote, referring to Trump’s assistant, “we began acting on your question about our team revising the complaint filed by Texas into what could be the first draft of a complaint filed by the United States. The lawyers with whom I have been working took on that task, and we now have a draft that could be presented to you to review, and by you to Mr. Rosen to edit, improve and file.”
That was a reference to Jeffrey Rosen, the acting attorney general. In his memo, Olson recounted that during their discussions, he had told Trump that he had followed the president’s suggestion to call Rosen a few hours earlier requesting that the acting attorney general file a lawsuit to try to block Joe Biden’s Electoral College victory.
Trump, based on Olson’s memo, was aware that Rosen was slow-walking his request. The suit was never filed; Rosen testified last month before the Jan. 6 committee that doing so was out of the bounds of the law.
A spokesperson for Rosen said that he did not recall speaking with Olson but that it was accurate that the acting attorney general was against filing any lawsuits to interfere with the election results.
At the time of the memo, Trump had decamped to Mar-a-Lago, but Olson encouraged him to return to Washington to fight the election results from his perch in the White House. Trump did so shortly thereafter, working through the holidays on challenging the election results.
“I do not believe you can do what is required to be done from Florida,” Olson wrote to the president. “And, it would send a message about your commitment to the task, to leave Mar-a-Lago to take charge at the White House. I urge you to return as soon as it can be arranged.”
Olson also encouraged Trump to fire or reassign Rosen should he not go along with the plans to use the Justice Department to challenge the election in court, though Olson acknowledged such action would draw negative news coverage.
“This step will likely bring on a thousand stories making an analogy to ‘Saturday Night Massacre’ in 1973 when President Nixon ordered AG Elliot Richardson to fire Archibald Cox as a special counsel investigating Watergate,” he wrote.
Olson said a new White House counsel should take steps to ensure a “fair election count,” though he conceded that would be seen by many as “martial law.”
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.