Ghislaine Maxwell, the Jeffrey Epstein associate accused of sex trafficking, sits next to defense attorney Jeffrey Pagliucca as she takes notes during a charging conference in New York City on Dec. 18.JANE ROSENBERG/Reuters
The jury in Ghislaine Maxwell’s sexual-abuse trial began deliberating on Monday over whether the British socialite set up teenage girls to have sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein or if she is a scapegoat for the late financier.
Ms. Maxwell, 59, is accused of recruiting and grooming four teenage girls for Mr. Epstein between 1994 and 2004. Those accusers, now women in their 30s or 40s, said in emotional and explicit testimony that Ms. Maxwell made touching Mr. Epstein feel normal to them – and said she sometimes touched their bodies herself.
On trial for three weeks in federal court in Manhattan, Ms. Maxwell has pleaded not guilty to charges of sex trafficking and other crimes. Mr. Epstein died by suicide in a jail cell in 2019 at the age of 66 while awaiting trial on sexual-abuse charges.
“Your function is to weigh the evidence in the case and to determine whether or not the government has proved that Ms. Maxwell is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt,” U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan instructed 12 jurors and five alternates before deliberations began.
Jurors deliberated for just less than an hour on Monday and will resume deliberations on Tuesday.
Earlier on Monday, prosecutor Alison Moe said in her closing argument that Ms. Maxwell was Mr. Epstein’s “partner in crime.” She said Ms. Maxwell, a one-time girlfriend and employee of Epstein’s, saw helping Mr. Epstein abuse underage girls as a means to maintain her opulent lifestyle.
Ms. Moe argued Ms. Maxwell’s presence made young girls feel comfortable spending time with Mr. Epstein. Otherwise, receiving an invitation to be with a middle-aged man would have seemed “creepy” and “set off alarm bells,” Ms. Moe said.
“Epstein could not have done this alone,” Ms. Moe said. “When that man is accompanied by a posh, smiling, respectable, age-appropriate woman, that’s when everything starts to seem legitimate. And when that woman … acts like it’s totally normal for that man to touch those girls, it lures them into a trap.”
Ms. Maxwell defence lawyer Laura Menninger countered that Ms. Maxwell was an “innocent woman” whom prosecutors had targeted because Mr. Epstein is no longer alive.
She argued that the women’s memories had been corrupted over the decades and said they were motivated by money to implicate Ms. Maxwell. All four women said they received millions of dollars from a victims’ compensation fund established by Mr. Epstein’s estate.
The defence repeatedly pressed the women during cross-examinations as to why they did not mention Ms. Maxwell during their initial conversations with law enforcement agents about Mr. Epstein.
“They all changed their stories when the Epstein victims’ compensation fund was opened up,” Ms. Menninger told the jury. “That should make you hesitate.”
Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.