Skip to main content
opinion

Members of the Taliban walk past an anti-America mural on the wall of the former U.S. embassy in Kabul on Aug. 12.ALI KHARA/Reuters

Brahma Chellaney, Professor of Strategic Studies at the New Delhi-based Center for Policy Research and Fellow at the Robert Bosch Academy in Berlin, is the author of Water, Peace, and War: Confronting the Global Water Crisis.

In the year since the United States’ disgraceful abandonment of Afghanistan to the Taliban, the country has gone down precisely the path any logical observer would have predicted: a medieval, jihadist, terrorist-sheltering emirate has been established. While nobody will pay a higher price than Afghans, the U.S. will incur costs for betraying its Afghan allies for a long time to come.

The geopolitical fallout of America’s humiliating retreat from Afghanistan – after President Joe Biden followed through on the withdrawal commitment of his predecessor, Donald Trump – is still growing. By exposing the U.S. as a power in decline, the withdrawal gave a huge boost to militant Islamists everywhere, while emboldening Russia and China.

In Afghanistan, women and girls have lost their rights to employment and education, with many girls subjected to sexual slavery through forced marriages to Taliban fighters. Taliban death squads have been systematically identifying and murdering those who co-operated with U.S. forces. Torture and execution have become commonplace. Afghanistan’s Hindus and Sikhs – descendants of those who withstood the medieval-era conversions to Sunni Islam by the country’s Arab conquerors – have been fleeing to India to avoid slaughter.

The regime’s cabinet is a veritable who’s who of international terrorists and narcotics kingpins. Sirajuddin Haqqani, for instance, has been made responsible for Afghanistan’s internal security and preventing the country from becoming a safe haven for international terrorists – but he is the leader of the ruthless Haqqani network. And not surprisingly, the Taliban continues to shelter known terrorists, as the recent Biden-ordered assassination of al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in central Kabul showed.

The U.S. also left behind US$7.1-billion worth of weapons in its chaotic withdrawal from the country, compounding the danger to Afghanistan and its neighbours. According to a recent Pentagon report, the U.S. has no plans to retrieve or destroy the equipment, despite recognizing that the Taliban has already “repaired some damaged Afghan Air Force aircraft and made incremental gains in its capability to employ these aircraft in operations.”

In short, Mr. Biden’s decision to overrule his generals and withdraw from Afghanistan – even before his own target date of Sept. 11, 2021 – has created a security and humanitarian nightmare. And Mr. Biden is apparently nowhere near finished making foreign-policy blunders in Afghanistan.

After Kabul’s fall, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken declared that the U.S. would judge its future engagement with the Taliban-led government based on “one simple proposition”: whether it helps the U.S. advance its interests, including “seeing that women’s rights are upheld,” delivering humanitarian assistance, and pursuing counterterrorism. But even though the Taliban has failed on all three counts, the Biden administration is gradually easing sanctions on the regime.

At the UN, the U.S. spearheaded a resolution providing for a humanitarian exemption to the sanctions imposed on Afghanistan. The U.S. Treasury Department’s General Licenses, aimed at facilitating the provision of humanitarian relief, now allow financial transactions involving the Taliban and the Haqqani network. And the U.S. is currently negotiating with the Taliban over the release of US$3.5-billion in Afghan central-bank reserves.

Meanwhile, the U.S. refuses to target Mr. Haqqani or other leading terrorists in Kabul. Yes, Mr. al-Zawahiri was assassinated, but contrary to the Biden administration’s narrative, he was not all that influential: He was largely retired, living with members of his extended family in a Kabul house under Mr. Haqqani’s protection.

What’s next? Will the U.S. now reward Pakistan – one of America’s 18 “major non-NATO allies” – for opening its airspace to the drone that killed Mr. al-Zawahiri? True, Pakistan reared the Taliban and engineered the U.S. defeat in Afghanistan, but now it wants an early International Monetary Fund loan dispersal to help it avert a debt default.

Likewise, will the U.S. now continue to pursue the release of Afghanistan’s central-bank reserves to the Taliban, despite its indisputable harboring of terrorists and establishment of an oppressive and violent Islamic state? The Biden administration defends its engagement with the Taliban by speciously contending that the top terrorist threat in Afghanistan is the Islamic State-Khorasan, but ISIS-K has relatively few members, no state sponsor or Afghan allies, and controls no territory.

The Biden administration seems committed to striking a kind of Faustian bargain with the Taliban. But to what end? The Taliban’s political power and Islamist ideology make it a critical link in the international jihadist movement. And its rule is threatening to turn Afghanistan into a breeding ground for international terrorism, narcotics trafficking, and mass migration. There is no justification for engaging with it.

Through its precipitous and bungling withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Biden administration handed Islamists worldwide their greatest victory. But the war in Afghanistan is hardly over. As the Taliban’s self-styled emir, Mullah Haibatullah Akhundzada, recently declared: “This war never ends, and it will continue till judgment day.”

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2022.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.