Hedge fund managers fear the painful losses they suffered in the meme stock trading frenzy of January 2021 will be repeated if U.S. regulators press ahead with reforms to securities lending, one of the most opaque practices in financial markets.
Melvin Capital Management LP, Light Street Capital Management LLC and White Square Capital LLC all lost heavily when their bets against meme stocks, such as the struggling video game retailer GameStop Corp. GME-N, were pulverized by retail investors who swap trading ideas on bulletin boards such as Reddit’s r/wallstreetbets.
But the extreme volatility unleashed in the meme stock battle alarmed the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the U.S. financial markets regulator that is determined to prevent a repeat of the debacle.
Gary Gensler, the SEC chair, said in November that it was time to bring securities lending “out of the dark.”
The SEC has proposed extensive reforms to securities lending arrangements that allow hedge funds to pay a fee to borrow stocks and bonds in order to bet that an asset will fall in value – the process known as “short selling.”
Lenders and lending agents will pay about US$375-million combined in initial costs and US$140-million annually thereafter to comply with the proposed reporting requirements, according to the SEC.
But the drastic changes in reporting and disclosure standards the SEC has planned have triggered opposition from hedge funds and other key players in securities lending, including BlackRock Inc., the world’s largest asset manager.
Jennifer Han, head of regulatory affairs at the Managed Funds Association (MFA), the Washington-based trade body that represents hedge fund managers, says the SEC’s proposals were “misguided” and could create more meme-stock style volatility “leading to situations similar to the GameStop market event.”
Ms. Han says the MFA was “strongly concerned” that other market participants would be able to reconstruct or reverse-engineer a hedge fund’s trading strategy if the SEC insisted on highly detailed reporting of securities lending transactions, even if this information was anonymized.
The Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA), the London-based trade body that represents hedge funds and private credit managers with combined assets of more than US$2-trillion, expressed similar objections.
The SEC’s proposals would allow other traders to “front-run or short squeeze” hedge funds that wanted to bet against a company’s stock, says Jiri Krol, head of government and regulatory affairs at AIMA.
Several hedge fund managers say they saw little upside in talking about their short positions in the current environment. David Einhorn, founder of Greenlight Capital Inc., which made big bets against Tesla Inc. TSLA-Q and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., has curtailed his public discussions around his short positions sharply. He has declined to comment.
But Carson Block, the founder of Muddy Waters Research LLC, says the new reporting requirements would benefit all market participants by “making it easier to gauge skepticism about a company and its propensity to be driven upward in a short squeeze, GameStop being the modern day poster child.”
Demand from hedge funds pushed the cost of borrowing GameStop shares to more than 100 per cent during the second quarter of 2020 – an exceptionally high level. By contrast, average lending fees on other U.S. securities were around 1.5 per cent at the same time.
Revenue from lending GameStop shares reached US$121.7-million over the 18 months ending June 30, according to the data provider IHS Markit Ltd.
The SEC says that the high costs required to borrow GameStop shares could have constrained short-sellers and contributed to a price bubble.
Many ordinary investors also lost out when the GameStop bubble popped and the value of the retailer’s shares collapsed from an intraday high of US$483 in late January 2021 to US$40.59 by mid-February.
“Speculators are not the only ones harmed when a bubble collapses. There is collateral damage to innocent bystanders including buy-and-hold retirement investors in index funds,” says James Angel, a finance professor at Georgetown University’s McDonough business school.
One of the SEC’s most contentious proposals is that all lenders of securities should be required to provide details of their transactions within 15 minutes to a central regulatory body, most likely the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which will publish some of the data.
BlackRock, which earned US$555-million from securities lending last year, says intraday reporting would provide “low informational value” to the SEC while imposing significant additional costs on lenders. BlackRock wants the deadline for reporting to be shifted to the close of the following trading day.
Better Markets, a Washington-based think tank, warned that high-speed traders would be able to exploit the delay in reporting transactions and said shortening the deadline would be “eminently feasible without adding significant cost.”
Stephen Hall, legal director at Better Markets, urged the SEC not to dilute its proposals.
“The financial industry often seeks to weaken or eliminate regulations by arguing that the [proposed] requirements will have a devastating impact on their business which will in turn harm the public interest. These types of claims are typically exaggerated if not entirely groundless,” said Mr. Hall.
The scale of the business that could be affected is unappreciated widely.
IHS Markit reported the average daily value of U.S. equities on loan at US$540-billion in the first half of 2021 compared with US$428-billion for the whole of the previous year. That created a revenue pool worth US$1.9-billion in the first half of last year and US$3.3-billion over the whole of 2020.
According to the SEC, the value of all securities on loan in the U.S. stood at around US$1.5-trillion at the end of September 2020. The data are, however, both incomplete and unavailable to the general public. Aggregate short interest for individual stocks is currently reported only twice a month, meaning market participants are often relying on stale data.
© The Financial Times Limited 2022. All Rights Reserved. FT and Financial Times are trademarks of the Financial Times Ltd. Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way.
For more from Globe Advisor, visit our homepage.