Innovation in technology is not going to stop because there was a bad year in the stock market, an expert says.NACHO DOCE/Reuters
Sign up for the Globe Advisor weekly newsletter for professional financial advisors on our newsletter sign-up page. Get exclusive investment industry news and insights, the week’s top headlines, and what you and your clients need to know.
Metaverse-themed investment funds were one of the hottest investment stories of 2022, with dozens of metaverse-labelled exchange-traded funds (ETFs) launched to capture the theme.
But now, investors would be hard-pressed to find the word metaverse in the news. The worst tech stock collapse in two decades means that investor interest in areas with an interesting future but limited short-term prospects has dried up.
Still, that doesn’t mean that the development of the metaverse has stopped. Patient investors can still find opportunities as it continues to develop, analysts say, but progress will be gradual and volatile.
For now, a more urgent focus for companies such as Meta Platforms Inc. META-Q is how to respond to the challenges unleashed by generative artificial intelligence (AI) personified by OpenAI’s Chat GPT. Microsoft Corp. MSFT-Q is an OpenAI partner and opened a competitive floodgate by integrating the software into its Bing search engine and Azure cloud service.
“Every investor is talking about generative AI and trying to figure out how to invest in it and how to avoid being disrupted by it,” says Brad Erickson, internet analyst with RBC Capital Markets in Portland, Ore. “That’s the biggest reason that metaverse relevance has died – generative AI.”
Mr. Erickson adds the metaverse’s development is an evolution rather than a revolution, and “a decade’s long journey” whose final destination is unknown.
He says Meta’s goal is to build a dominant platform that will act as a gateway for its 2.9-billion active monthly Facebook users. This platform will be a “walled garden” in which other products and services pay to gain access to Meta’s audience. The near-term challenge is to shore up advertising revenue. Mr. Erickson estimates that US$2-billion of Meta’s announced $12-billion of cost cuts could be metaverse related.
“They are not running away [from the metaverse]. It’s still an important, strategic long-term initiative,” he says. “But there’s so much change in digital advertising they have had to focus [there.] That’s far more important this year.”
Closures, partnerships and gaming
There is plenty of other metaverse-related news. Walt Disney Co. DIS-N recently closed a division that was working on metaverse strategies. The cuts were part of its wider layoffs. Microsoft has wound down its industrial metaverse project as a part of its layoff of 10,000 people. Instead, it is teaming up with graphic chip leader Nvidia Corp. NVDA-Q.
Nvidia’s omniverse system is using Microsoft’s Azure cloud to allow engineers to collaborate on projects. Siemens AG SIEGY, Europe’s largest industrial manufacturer, is piggybacking on Nvidia’s efforts. Its engineers and designers can access Nvidia-generated 3D representations of products, machinery or entire manufacturing facilities to optimize designs.
Microsoft’s US$69-billion pursuit of video game maker Activision Blizzard Inc. ATVI-Q is seen in part as a long-term metaverse play. The acquisition faces regulatory headwinds, but gaming is one area in which virtual reality has taken off. The acquisition bolsters Microsoft’s gaming business. In another initiative, Microsoft is working with the U.S. Pentagon to develop virtual reality night vision goggles.
Elliot Johnson, chief investment officer at Toronto-based Evolve Funds Group Inc., says investors have reason to be positive.
“You need to look five to 10 years out,” he says. “It’s very easy to be bearish on tech. But do we think that innovation in the technology world is going to stop because there was a bad year in the stock market?”
Evolve markets one of two Canadian metaverse ETFs launched as part of the craze. Both are quite small and had sharp sell-offs in 2022, although both have rebounded this year. The strategies differ, but they have overlapping holdings.
For example, Evolve Metaverse ETF MESH-T and Horizons Global Metaverse Index ETF MTAV-T both hold Meta, Nvidia, Alphabet, Microsoft and Activision Blizzard.
Mr. Johnson believes Meta isn’t wrong, just early. When it changed its name, investors expected something big to follow. When it didn’t, they wondered what the fuss was about.
So, what should investors do?
One strategy is to invest in mega-cap techs such as Microsoft, Meta and Alphabet, which have the financial depth to develop the theme while generating cash from core businesses.
Another strategy is an ETF with a broader tech focus because it offers a diversified approach with a mix of large and small companies as well as subsectors such as hardware, software and services, networking and digital content creation.
“If you look back at the internet early on, you didn’t want to buy Palm Pilot only to find out that BlackBerry has beaten them and then Apple launched the iPhone and beat BlackBerry,” Mr. Johnson says.
Nick Clegg, Meta’s head of global affairs, said in a recent interview with Bloomberg LLP that the metaverse is still a core focus for the company.
“We’re going to stick with it because the early evidence suggests that something like this will be the heart of the new computing platform,” he said. “But it’s going to take a while.”
That’s a clear message for investors.
Adam Mayers is a contributing editor to the Internet Wealth Builder investment newsletter.
For more from Globe Advisor, visit our homepage.