Strive said it would 'call on energy companies to evaluate all current and future internal investments exclusively based on financially measurable returns on investment, without regard to any other social, political, cultural or environmental goals.'Angus Mordant/Reuters
Sign up for the Globe Advisor weekly newsletter for professional financial advisors on our newsletter sign-up page. Get exclusive investment industry news and insights, the week’s top headlines, and what you and your clients need to know.
An anti-ESG exchange-traded fund (ETF) has attracted US$315-million in less than a month, an eye-catching success for its start-up issuer and in marked contrast to the slower progress of other “anti-woke” ETFs.
Strive Asset Management LLC’s Strive U.S. Energy ETF DRLL-A success in raising assets comes at a time when a swath of other “anti-woke” ETFs have struggled to get past US$25-million.
The launch comes as Florida has passed a resolution barring its pension fund managers from embedding environmental, social and governance-related factors into their investing strategies, while Texas has criticized BlackRock Inc. and nine European financial houses for “boycotting” the fossil fuel industry as part of their ESG drives.
“We’re representing the voices of a lot of everyday citizens who have their money invested by other asset managers used to advance social and political agendas that they do not agree with. That’s a breach of their fiduciary duty, in my opinion,” says Vivek Ramaswamy, executive chair of Strive. “People are voting with their feet.”
Columbus, Ohio-based Strive’s ethos is to be strictly apolitical, taking politics out of business and sending “a message to corporate America that they should focus on delivering excellent products and services rather than anything else,” says Mr. Ramaswamy, an entrepreneur who founded Roivant Sciences, a US$2.5-billion Nasdaq-listed health care company.
“Our voting and advocacy decisions are made with the sole interest of maximizing the value of our clients’ investment accounts, with no mixed motivation to also advance a social objective,” adds Mr. Ramaswamy, who believed the ESG approach harmed returns.
Strive plans to launch a series of passive index ETFs that can offer a viable alternative to pre-existing mainstream funds. For example, Strive U.S. Energy ETF has an expense ratio of 41 basis points (bps), which was identical at launch to BlackRock’s US$2.1-billion iShares U.S. Energy ETF IYE-A, although the iShares ETF’s fee has since been cut to 39 bps.
Strive U.S. Energy ETF’s portfolio has a 99.7 per cent historical correlation with iShares U.S. Energy ETF, according to Strive – and the start-up asset manager plans to use its voting power to attempt to counter the influence of the large asset managers.
Specifically, for Strive U.S. Energy ETF, Strive said it would “call on energy companies to evaluate all current and future internal investments exclusively based on financially measurable returns on investment, without regard to any other social, political, cultural or environmental goals.”
This would translate into capital investment in exploration and production being based on “growing domestic and international demand for carbon-based energy.”
Mr. Ramaswamy is also exercised by the pressure placed on boards to reduce “Scope 3″ greenhouse gas emissions – those generated by the use of their products.
“Why is it in the best interests of a company to adopt Scope 3 emissions planning?” Mr. Ramaswamy asks. “It’s literally calling for consumers to use less of the product that [the company] sells. In what other [sectors] does that make sense?”
Resolutions calling for companies to embrace quotas based on measures such as employees’ ethnicity and gender are also in Strive’s crosshairs, in the belief that “hiring should be based on merit, not on race, sex or politics.”
Mr. Ramaswamy’s philosophy is not that social, political, cultural and environmental goals are unimportant, “but they should be sorted out through the political process” rather than by powerful fund managers pressuring companies to kowtow to their belief systems.
He is also of the view that climate change caused by humans is real, but argues that fossil fuels should be measured by both the harms they cause and the benefits they bring, such as their role in enabling innovation and development.
At first glance, it might seem that Strive has little hope of achieving any real change unless it builds scale.
This may not be strictly so, though. Engine No. 1, an equally small ETF provider whose two ETFs have a combined US$420-million of assets under management, aims to make companies more “sustainable.” It succeeded last year in getting three of its four nominees voted on to ExxonMobil Corp.’s 12-strong board, despite having a stake of just 0.02 per cent.
Mr. Ramaswamy, who says he had engaged with 10 investee companies since Strive U.S. Energy ETF’s launch, claims he was pushing at a partially open door.
“Many of these employees and management teams and even boards are inclined to go in the direction we want them to go, they have just had handcuffs put on them by the large asset managers,” he says.
Despite financial backing from Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal Holdings Inc., and hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, Strive is likely to need to scale up fast in order to achieve the economies of scale of the large houses, given that it’s matching them on price.
Advisors had mixed views on Strive’s likelihood of achieving this.
Todd Rosenbluth, head of research at VettaFi LLC, doesn’t buy Mr. Ramaswamy’s argument that ESG imperatives were damaging shareholder returns. He also doubts Strive’s ability to reach scale.
“There have been other asset managers that have attempted to offer an alternative to ESG investing and have struggled to gather assets,” Mr. Rosenbluth says.
“[Strive has] had a good first wave of inflows. Will there be a second or third wave? I’m not sure,” he adds.
However, Nate Geraci, president of The ETF Store, was more optimistic.
“If Strive can position itself as attempting to remove politics from investing, I believe they’ll continue building on the initial success of [Strive U.S. Energy ETF],” he says.
“There’s no question it’s trying boldly to compete in the absolute toughest area of ETFs – low-cost, plain-vanilla exposure. Strive will certainly have an uphill battle to scale assets to a viable level, but its timing seems rather opportune given the recent ESG backlash.”
© The Financial Times Limited 2022. All Rights Reserved. FT and Financial Times are trademarks of the Financial Times Ltd. Not to be redistributed, copied, or modified in any way.
For more from Globe Advisor, visit our homepage.