Skip to main content

Craig James, former clerk of the B.C. legislative assembly, arrives at B.C. Supreme Court, in Vancouver, on March 1.DARRYL DYCK/The Canadian Press

The actions of the former clerk of British Columbia’s legislature require “unequivocal denunciation” from the court, the Crown attorney said during a sentencing hearing for Craig James on Monday.

Brock Martland said the conduct of Mr. James, 71, was a “departure” by the most senior officer of the legislature, who was found guilty in May of fraud and breach of trust over expenses he claimed.

“There are not just theoretical but real risks of undermining public confidence in the institutions of government and of increasing public cynicism about institutions of government,” he said.

Mr. Martland said there are situations where conditional sentences are granted, and while they often “involve high dollar amounts,” they usually come with a guilty plea.

He said the Crown would like to see Mr. James jailed for a year or to serve a term of house arrest, saying the sentence would act as a deterrent for future public officials.

The Crown also wants Mr. James to pay $1,886.72 restitution.

In May, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Heather Holmes found Mr. James guilty of fraud and breach of trust related to inappropriate personal expenses over the purchase of a new suit and shirts as work attire.

Because the charges were related to the same evidence, the judge entered a stay on the fraud count, and he was convicted of breach of trust.

Mr. James was found not guilty on three other counts of breach of trust, including one related to a $258,000 retirement benefit.

Justice Holmes ruled Mr. James breached the standard of conduct expected of him in his public position in a “serious and marked way.”

She said “his purpose was a dishonest one, to benefit himself at the public’s expense.”

Justice Holmes has reserved her decision on his sentence until Friday.

Defence lawyer Gavin Cameron told the sentencing hearing that Mr. James is remorseful and has suffered enough as he asked for a conditional sentence, meaning his client wouldn’t spend time in jail.

Incarceration would be a “disproportionate response,” Mr. Cameron said.

Instead, he said 12 months of probation and 150 hours of community service would be appropriate.

Mr. Cameron said Mr. James has faced stigma owing to media coverage and “was tried and convicted in the court of public opinion” long before the court determined a verdict.

“His reputation was destroyed in an instant and it will never be recovered,” he said.

The media coverage should be taken into consideration for sentencing because it will serve as more of a deterrent for others than a jail sentence would for Mr. James, he said.

“Denunciation and specific and general deterrents have been achieved in spades,” Mr. Cameron said. “No person would ever again take the chance to seek reimbursement for a suit and shirt seeing what’s happening here.”

He said other mitigating circumstances include Mr. James’s age, being a first-time offender, and loss of his job and reputation. Mr. Cameron also cited support letters from colleagues, including former B.C. premier Gordon Campbell, who said Mr. James was helpful and respected by members on both sides of the House.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.