Seen from above, much of Canada looks like a landscape built out of carbon.
In towering West Coast groves and across the boreal forest that spans much of the country, trees and other vegetation have trapped billions of tonnes of carbon – all of it ripped from the air, atom by atom, to sustain plant growth. This vast reserve is an asset in the battle against climate change, containing more carbon than Canadian cars and factories combined have released in more than a century.
But this living carbon capture and storage system is only the tip of the iceberg. Beneath the trees, the leaf litter and the networks of roots are deep layers of peat and carbon-rich soil, the decomposed remains of plants that have been accumulating since the end of the last ice age, some 10,000 years ago.
Mean carbon density
** Soil to a depth of one metre.
On Wednesday, at the United Nations climate conference in Glasgow, WWF Canada is set to release the most detailed map ever produced of the country’s carbon stocks, based on data gathered and analyzed in collaboration with researchers at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont.
The map divides Canada’s land area into a mosaic of squares 250 metres across and shows the distribution of all the carbon stored in its forests and plant life – a total of 21.1 billion tonnes. To this it adds a new estimate of soil carbon, achieved through a combination of field data, remote sensing and machine learning.
That estimate comes in at a staggering 384 billion tonnes. And while there are large uncertainties around the figure – the precise amount of soil carbon ranges between eight and 28 times what is stored in plants – there is no doubt it represents the largest share of Canada’s carbon stocks by far. The areas rich in soil carbon are diverse and complicated, and some are acting as carbon sinks, taking up some of the carbon dioxide we are emitting by burning fossil fuels. But much of that soil carbon lies in places where disturbing it could wreak havoc with Canada’s net-zero emissions goals.
“It’s a globally important amount in terms of its broader implications for the climate … And it’s important in terms of our responsibility to steward and protect those places,” said James Snider, WWF Canada’s vice-president of science, knowledge and innovation.
Regional diversity
An obvious and important feature of the soil carbon is that it is not evenly distributed, neither in geographic extent nor in terms of its richness in the ground. This suggests the map can also serve as a guide for prioritizing regions for protection as Canada tries to fulfill an international commitment to conserve at least 30 per cent of its territory by 2030. And it is also crucial information for Indigenous peoples making the case for maintaining their traditional territories.
Carbon captured in nature by province
Soil carbon (0-1m)
Forest carbon
Manitoba
110
3.4
Ontario
82.6
4.8
NWT
48.7
2.7
N.L.
3.8
47
Quebec
4.3
45.7
B.C.
42
6.2
Yukon
35.1
3.6
Atlantic
34.6
3.1
Saskatchewan
32.8
4
Nunavut
31.1
2
Alberta
22.9
5.2
0
40
80
120
Mean density (kg/m2)
THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: WWF CANADA
Carbon captured in nature by province
Soil carbon (0-1m)
Forest carbon
Manitoba
110
3.4
Ontario
82.6
4.8
NWT
48.7
2.7
N.L.
3.8
47
Quebec
4.3
45.7
B.C.
6.2
42
Yukon
35.1
3.6
Atlantic
34.6
3.1
Saskatchewan
32.8
4
Nunavut
31.1
2
Alberta
22.9
5.2
0
40
80
120
Mean density (kg/m2)
THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: WWF CANADA
Carbon captured in nature by province
Soil carbon (0-1m)
Forest carbon
Manitoba
110
3.4
Ontario
82.6
4.8
Northwest Territories
48.7
2.7
Newfoundland and Labrador
3.8
47
Quebec
4.3
45.7
British Columbia
6.2
42
Yukon
35.1
3.6
Atlantic Provinces
34.6
3.1
Saskatchewan
32.8
4
Nunavut
31.1
2
Alberta
22.9
5.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Mean density (kg/m2)
THE GLOBE AND MAIL, SOURCE: WWF CANADA
Overall, Manitoba and Ontario have the highest average densities by large margins. This is because the boundaries of both provinces overlap with some of Canada’s highest concentrations of peat. But the new analysis suggests there is a more extensive and varied storehouse than previously appreciated.
Exploring the underground
The map was created to help with a broader effort in conservation science to better quantify ecosystem services – the things nature does and provides that make life possible for people around the world. At a time when countries are debating carbon pricing schemes as a way to reduce emissions, the ability of a natural landscape to hold carbon indefinitely comes with measurable value.
By touring around Canada’s new carbon map, it’s possible to get a sense of where that value lies.
There is currently no way to directly sample a territory as large as Canada in order to build such a map, particularly because so much of the country’s land area is so difficult and expensive for researchers to access. This has made it a challenge for those who are trying to pin down exactly how much carbon is stored in Canada’s landscape.
To overcome this obstacle, Alemu Gonsamo, who leads McMaster University’s Remote Sensing Group, and Camile Sothe, a postdoctoral researcher, used a learning algorithm – a computer program they trained to estimate carbon content based on satellite data they linked to field measurements. They then tested the algorithm on a second set of data to ensure its performance before setting about building a national map. The entire project took two years to complete.
“The biggest finding is that the amount of carbon in the top one metre of soil is so huge compared to other estimates,” Dr. Gonsamo said, adding that it exceeds the amount stored in the Amazon rainforest.
The group is now working to narrow the uncertainties around its results. They have begun a follow-up study that would involve working with an Indigenous team to gather more field data in some of the highest-density carbon regions near Hudson Bay.
A large share of Canada’s soil carbon reserve is in the form of peat, a type of soil that is rich in organic matter and has outsized importance because it stores 20 to 30 per cent of the world’s carbon in just 3 per cent of its surface area.
Lorna Harris, an ecosystem scientist at the University of Alberta, is the lead author on a separate analysis of Canadian peatlands, which account for a quarter of the global total. According to that study, also presented this week at the UN climate conference, at least 12,000 square kilometres of peatlands have already been disturbed by agricultural and other activities. Meanwhile, Canada’s stated goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050 depends on global carbon sinks, including peatlands, absorbing about half the carbon dioxide released by human activity.
The consequences of losing more of that carbon sink and potentially turning it into yet another source of atmospheric carbon is something Canada has not yet fully taken on board. The pathways for doing so are numerous, including the effects of mining, forestry, road building, drainage and seismic lines.
“We can say we’ve got the carbon under ground but we don’t yet have the knowledge to assess those impacts,” Dr. Harris said.
Critically, this includes the development of Northern Ontario’s Ring of Fire region, which Premier Doug Ford said Tuesday he would like to see mined for raw materials needed for the transition to electric vehicles.
But the area sits squarely in the midst of some of the richest peatlands in Canada. If measures are not taken to protect its stored carbon, its exploitation will invariably increase the country’s carbon output.
“If you don’t have a long-term perspective on managing these areas, you can lose a ton of emissions that will undermine all of our other efforts,” said Justina Ray, the president of the Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, who co-authored the analysis.
She added that peatlands are not included in Canada’s national inventory of emissions and contributions to reducing climate change under the 2015 Paris Agreement.
Matthew Mitchell, a University of British Columbia researcher who specializes in ecosystem services and was not involved in either study, said the new results set the stage for more detailed investigations of Canada’s buried carbon, including how it is changing as the planet warms.
“If you don’t know what you have, you don’t know what you’ve lost,” he said. “And if we can understand better what the threats are to that carbon, then we can start to come up with strategies for how to keep it in the ground.”
Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.