Two Alberta First Nations have asked the federal government to examine whether a component of oil sands tailings pond water known to harm fish and other animals should be classed as toxic.
The move could force a long-awaited human health study into development impacts, bring the industry under new regulations and affect its ability to release treated wastewater.
“There are big gaps in science on the human health side,” said Bronwyn Roe, lawyer for the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, which uses lands adjacent to oil sands development. “If the ministers do this assessment, they could create new regulations.”
That First Nation’s request is supported by the Mikisew Cree.
“Under federal legislation … fish have more rights than humans,” it wrote in a March 11 letter to federal Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault. “The government of Canada cannot wait for more research to make this assessment.”
The two nations are concerned about naphthenic acids, found in tailings and other oil sands wastewater. Peer-reviewed research has found the complex hydrocarbons are toxic to fish, affect hormone function in humans and other mammals, and may be carcinogenic.
Oil sands producers are required to report releases of those chemicals. But allowable limits for their presence in surface or groundwater are guidelines, not regulations.
In January, Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada released a report that concluded naphthenic acids shouldn’t be classified as toxic. However, that report only dealt with commercially produced versions, not those found in tailings.
“(Oil sands) naphthenic acids differ in source, composition, properties and use compared to commercial naphthenic acids,” the report says.
The First Nations are using recent changes to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act to request Guilbeault review that January finding. A review would include research into the health effects of oil sands naphthenic acids both on their own and in conjunction with other chemicals – a long-standing goal of both the Athabasca Chipewyan and Mikisew.
“A huge piece is that human health study,” said Roe. “They've been asking for that for years.
“They want better studies of the human health impacts of oil sands operations, including releases from tailings ponds.”
A ruling that naphthenic acids should be considered a toxin would also affect regulations governing the substances, Roe said.
“Once the impact on human health is better understood, I think the government will be compelled to take action to mitigate the human health effects and the environmental effects.”
Roe notes the finding could affect plans to release treated tailings pond water into the Athabasca River. Industry and the federal government are currently developing rules that would govern how water from those ponds can be treated and released into the river.
Those regulations are expected in 2025. Roe said classifying naphthenic acids as toxic could affect those plans.
“It would have an effect on tailings pond management,” she said.
Kendall Dilling, president of the oil sands industry group Pathways Alliance, said further research on naphthenic acids is underway.
“We respect the leaders’ desire to seek information for the health of their community,” he said in an email. “We will continue to co-operate with government should additional research be advanced in response to this request.”
A spokesman for Environment and Climate Change Canada said Guilbeault and Health Minister Mark Holland are considering the request. The department is conducting further studies on naphthenic acids.
Oil sands tailings ponds now store about 1.4 trillion litres of water, or 1.4 cubic kilometres. Some evidence suggests the water has already entered the environment.
A 2017 report from the environmental watchdog of the North American free trade deal found “scientifically valid” evidence that tailings have escaped the ponds, although not the oil sands leases. That finding is echoed by recent groundwater reports from industry.
That seepage may now be off lease.
Alberta’s Oil sands Monitoring Program shows a common proxy for oil sands residue at a sampling station in the Muskeg River began climbing drastically in March 2022 and was 18 times higher than the 2021 average within a year.
Guilbeault and Holland have until June 7 to respond to the First Nations’ requests.